Posts Tagged 'spreadsheet compliance'

White Paper: Automating Spreadsheet Controls for Solvency II Model Compliance

Abstract
Spreadsheets, Access databases and other user-developed applications (UDAs) are front and center to Solvency II model development, providing flexibility and ample opportunities to optimize capital requirements. Absent the proper governance framework, these UDAs can be subject to a variety of unacceptable risks, including calculation errors due to faulty programming logic, non-compliance with the intent of the directive, and even fraudulent activity. This white paper examines the newly published governance mandates for Solvency II models, and offers a proven technology solution and best practices to help insurers and reinsurers in the European Union improve compliance while mitigating risk and driving significant process improvement.

Target Audience
CFOs, controllers, CIOs, COOs, CEOs, Chief Actuaries, VP IT Security & Risk, Certified Fraud Examiners, auditors, risk and compliance executives, spreadsheet developers, Solvency II project teams.

>>Download White Paper

Basel III & Spreadsheets – The Perfect Storm?

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland today announced the final rules for Basel III, a new global regulatory framework for banks. Building on the foundation of Basel II and similar to Solvency II in terms of focus on ensuring capital adequacy, Basel III also creates the perfect storm in terms of spreadsheet and end-user computing (EUC) risk. That is, banks leveraging spreadsheets, Access databases and other EUCs for computing the new capital requirements, risk-weighted assets, and liquidity (among other complex computations) are likely not prepared to satisfy auditor and regulator governance requirements mandates unless they have a controlled environment in place. Such EUCs are prone to input and logic errors, honest mistakes, fraud and almost impossible to manage (absent the proper controls) given the autonomy of users who can make changes to them.

To this end, Prodiance has been working with a number of global financial institutions to help them assess what is needed for effective spreadsheet and EUC governance for Basel II/III and Solvency II and how to implement best practices and leverage technology to help mitigate the risk of material errors while improving compliance with these new directives. You can read the press release from the BIS here or download a PDF of the final Basel III Accord. For more information on Prodiance ERM products and services, please visit our web site and stay tuned for further details on how Prodiance ERM technology, best practices, domain expertise and professional services offerings aligns with Basel III mandates.

If you have any anecdotes or comments on the new Basel III Accord, I’d love to hear from you. Finally, if your organization does not yet have a policy on End-User Computing in place, I would be happy to send you our template. Just drop me an email or leave a comment!

Happy holidays and safe travels!

Case Study: Improving Visibility & Control for Mission Critical Spreadsheets in Energy

energyIn 2006, a leading US energy provider performed an audit of spreadsheets and end-user computing applications and recognized the need to establish tighter IT controls. Many key spreadsheets used within finance and accounting operations were used in financial, regulatory and management reporting, and were considered in-scope for SOX 404 compliance. At the time, SOX testing for spreadsheets was a manual process evaluating access controls and security, documentation, change management and formula and link verification.

The Need for Automated Controls
Initial testing results concluded that although spreadsheets controls were adequate, they were very manual in nature and difficult to sustain. The director of internal audit and team lead for the project identified a variety of spreadsheet risks, including:

  • Widespread use of spreadsheets
  • Security access issues
  • No audit trail for changes and management review
  • Outdated documentation
  • New users did not always understand the impact of changes made
  • Manually intensive and error-prone review and approval processes

Business Drivers
Operating within a highly-regulated industry, the company had many compelling reasons to automate and improve spreadsheet controls, including mitigating operational risk, reducing audit cycles, and enabling compliance with corporate, regulatory and legal mandates. As a public company, they are subject to SOX 404, SEC and industry-specific regulations. They maintain an active operational risk program and are driven by continual process and quality improvements on a year over year basis. In addition, the company manages hundreds of contracts and has an aggressive M&A strategy. As such, automating controls over critical spreadsheets affected by these mandates represented an opportunity to take a proactive approach to sustaining compliance.

Adopting a Lifecycle Approach
To mitigate these risks, the director of internal audit and his team set out to establish a new methodology for spreadsheet and EUC control by leveraging best practices, the latest guidance from auditors, and software technology to make the new process sustainable. The new spreadsheet control lifecycle included creating a spreadsheet inventory, performing a risk assessment to identify critical spreadsheet tied to financial reporting, and applying automated controls to help track and manage changes.

As a best practice, the project team established risk assessment criteria to help categorize spreadsheets as financial, analytical and operational. Some examples include spreadsheets used in revenue accruals, journal entries (e.g. balance sheet flux analysis, income statement flux analysis, etc.), power controls for plant operations, and management reporting. In addition, the team evaluated spreadsheet complexity, including the number of formulas and spreadsheet size (in MB), number of external links or data sources, and any formula or structural errors.

Identifying Risky Spreadsheets
Risk assessment criteria included:

  • Application or use of the spreadsheet
  • Dollar amount impacted or controlled
  • Number of formulas
  • Complexity of the formulas
  • Number and extent of external links

Any spreadsheets that were deemed critical became candidates for monitoring and control. Risk levels for linked spreadsheets were determined through a relational risk assessment process, where any dependent spreadsheets deemed critical also became part of the controlled spreadsheet population.

The Solution
To automate the spreadsheet controls environment, the company chose the Prodiance Enterprise Spreadsheet Manager (ESM) system, including Prodiance Spreadsheet Compare and Prodiance Spreadsheet IQ. “We selected Prodiance because of their robust set of tools, their credibility with industry analysts, and their responsiveness to meet our needs,” said the director of internal audit.

eDiscovery_largeProdiance ESM provided pervasive monitoring (24x7x365) of all changes to critical spreadsheets and automated change control through cell level audit trails and versioning. Prodiance Spreadsheet Compare was utilized by business analysts to compare changes between spreadsheet versions in a side-by-side fashion to help speed review and approval cycles. Prodiance Spreadsheet IQ provided automated spreadsheet diagnostics to help internal auditors accelerate spreadsheet error checking and the evaluation of links.

SSIQ_large

 The Bottom Line
“By automating internal controls over critical spreadsheets with Prodiance technology, we have realized significant business benefits, including improved data integrity, fewer spreadsheet errors, reduced SOX testing of spreadsheets, reduced change control review, reduced remediation activity due to errors, reduced audit fees, and improved review and approval processes,” said the Chief Financial Officer for the company.

>>Download the Case Study (pdf)

New Webinar: Spreadsheets & Enterprise Risk, What Every CXO Needs to Know

 Webinar: Spreadsheets & Enterprise Risk

This new webinar features GRC expert Michael Rasmussen, president and Corporate Integrity LLC and Eric Perry, vice president of marketing at Prodiance.

Register Today Blue

Session Overview
A significant amount of today’s corporate data is stored in end-user computing (EUC) applications including spreadsheets and pc databases. These applications are used in many mission critical business processes – financial reporting, closing the books, revenue recognition, journal entries, equity and commodity trading, insurance and actuarial processes, scientific analysis, and more. Despite their power, speed and flexibility, EUCs often lack the proper safeguards and controls needed to prevent gross accounting errors, avoid poor decisions, prevent fraud, and protect against non-compliance with corporate and regulatory mandates.

Join Prodiance and GRC expert Michael Rasmussen for this online event to learn about what every CXO should know about spreadsheet and EUC risk, and how the latest technology and best practices can help organizations effectively mitigate risk, while improving productivity.

The agenda includes:

  • The latest industry trends, business drivers and regulatory mandates affecting spreadsheet and EUC risk
  • Best practices and auditor guidance for automating internal controls over mission critical EUCs
  • A demonstration of the Prodiance Enterprise Spreadsheet Manager system
  • A review of the business case and benefits

Who should attend: CFOs, controllers, CIOs, COOs, CEOs, VP IT Security & Risk, auditors, risk and compliance executives.

Register Today Blue

EUC Best Practice #2: Implement an EUC Control Policy

I’m pleased to introduce the 2nd post in my EUC Best Practices Series. This one introduces the operational side of the equation. Although technology is required to mitigate EUC risk on a sustainable basis, having an operational model is also a critical success factor.

Why Your Organization Needs an EUC Control Policy
Putting technology aside, perhaps the most critical element to any EUC Control initiative is to first ensure that a corporate policy is in place to govern the lifecycle of critical spreadsheets, Access databases and EUCs. Without a corporate policy, there is no indication that mitigating EUC risk is important to the business, and no way to ensure the proper safeguards are in place. Mitigating EUC risk is as much about technology as it is about business process, so an EUC Control Policy is a must have for any successful project.

Who Gets Involved?
Typically, an EUC Control policy is created in collaboration with various business lines that develop, use, and monitor EUCs – the CFO or controller, managers in various lines of business, IT, and internal audit.

Manual vs. Automated Controls
It should be written to support the type of controls being put in place (i.e. manual vs. automated). For manual controls, keep in mind that users will likely be required to perform additional manual tasks to comply with the policy, and that there may breakdowns in the process over time. These additional tasks can include things like periodic verification of proper access controls, creation and maintenance of the EUC inventory, risk assessment, documentation of critical EUCs, documentation and sign-off of significant changes, manual archiving of old versions, and periodic validation of high risk models.

Spreadsheet and EUC Management Software can automate many of these tasks. Keep in mind that if automated controls are being implemented with the deployment of new software, then the policy should be written to support and leverage the new software. This approach will ensure sustainable controls are embedded into everyday business operations.

So what goes into an EUC Control Policy?

Key Elements of an EUC Control Policy

  • Definition- A definition of EUCs along with some examples used within business lines (e.g. within finance examples may include account reconciliations, journal entries, financial statements, etc.). 
  • Categorization- Provide a taxonomy for users to identify and rank EUCs according to use (e.g. operational, financial, analytical) and risk levels (e.g. L1, L2, L3 or High, Medium, Low). 
  • Risk Assessment – Provide a methodology for determining what a risky spreadsheet is within your business. This can be based on a variety of criteria and factors, including complexity, financial significance (i.e. materiality), use, business process, regulatory process, or any number of criteria.Deloitte defines EUC risk based on Complexity and Materiality per the following example:

EUC Risk model based on Materiality and Complexity   A simplistic approach is to consider only Complexity as a first pass. The following is a simple algorhithm and for scoring EUCs based on Complexity. As mentioned above, other risk factors may include financial significance, business impact/use, and whether an EUC contains sensitive data or not.

 

 

risk_complexity_criteria

  • Control Requirements-  Define the IT controls required for critical vs. non-critical EUCs. Controls recommended by leading tax and audit firms include: development lifecycle, segregation of duties, access control, documentation, change control, testing/diagnostics, version control, back-up and archival. A complete set of EUC controls and definitions can be found in the PwC white paper entitled The Use of Spreadsheets: Considerations for Section for 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Again, if automated controls are being implemented, make sure the policy is written per software usage guidelines and users are required to leverage the software to satisfy control requirements.
  • Compliance Requirements- Define what the minimum requirements are to comply with the policy. For example, you may require business lines to ensure end users be trained on the new policy as well as any new control software, that business lines be required to inventory and risk rank their EUCs annually, and that business segments be required to comply within a 12 month timeframe.
  • Ownership – Define who is responsible for owning and maintaining the policy. This is a typically risk and control function.
  • Policy Review Schedule – Define how often the policy will be updated or revised.
  • Definitions- Be sure to define any new terms or acronyms like EUC, UDA, risk assessment, etc.

Remember, the goal of the EUC Control policy is to set the minimum standards for managing the lifecycle of EUCs within the organization to effectively mitigate risk, prevent fraud, and improve business processes, while enabling compliance.

Feel free to email me to request a sample EUC Control Policy that you can customize for your organization.

Good luck and let’s hear your comments!

Protiviti Says Unchecked Spreadsheets Can Lead to Major Accounting & Financial Reporting Problems

Yesterday Protiviti issued a press release and an update to their white paper entitled Spreadsheet Risk Management: Frequently Asked Questions. In the press release, Protiviti indicated that few organizations have properly addressed the risks associated with uncontrolled spreadsheets, but are now being forced to due to potential financial losses due to errors and fraud, regulatory pressures, and increasing scrutiny from auditors.

The white paper examines the risks associated with uncontrolled spreadsheets and EUCs, cites various cases of error and fraud, presents a framework for spreadsheet control, best practices for measuring risk, and a review of available technologies.

While the white paper is spot on for the type of information companies need now – how to get started, practical advice, frameworks, best practices – it is light on promoting technology. The main goal of any spreadsheet or EUC control initiative should be to embed the controls into everyday business processes and to make them sustainable. This cannot be achieved via manual processes and policies alone. It has to be driven by technology and automated controls.

You can view the press release here and the download the FAQ white paper here.

Enjoy, and please let me know your thoughts!

Spreadsheet Compliance: 5 Steps to Success

 

5 Steps to Success

5 Steps to Success

This article entitled 5 Steps to Success for Spreadsheet Compliance

by Jefferson Wells and Prodiance outlines 5 pragmatic steps organizations can take to improve spreadsheet compliance, including:

1. Inventory all spreadsheets

2. Assess spreadsheet risk

3. Perform mathmatical verification

4. Establish a controlled environment

5. Establish a corporate policy on spreadsheet control

You can download the article here from the Compliance Week web site.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 22 other followers

Follow Prodiance on Twitter

Prodiance on Twitter


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.